Notes for teachers, lecturers and school leaders on reading how students actually work with AI, instead of guessing from the finished text.
The IB leaves IA authentication to the subject teacher. Five checks for the one draft you read, mapped to the IB's 13 AI scenarios.
Ten signals for reading students' AI chat logs for understanding, not for catching, with example prompts and one rubric criterion to add to an assignment.
Five take-home final formats side by side, what each one lets you see when students use AI, and an AI block to paste into the instructions.
What the research and Turnitin's own documents say about AI detector accuracy, which universities switched detection off, and what instructors read instead.
The four checks the IB expects before a teacher authenticates coursework, what the 2027 Extended Essay adds, and the evidence to keep when students use AI.
Staged drafts, oral checks, in-class writing, AI chat logs or a process record: five ways to run a university essay assignment, compared.
Brisk Inspect Writing replays how a Google Doc was written. Cognity records the AI conversation itself. What each one shows a teacher, and when to use which.
When AI can produce any finished text, the finished text stops being evidence of learning. A process portfolio is what replaces it, and it is more useful than the essay ever was.
The IB requires AI-generated work to be credited in the text and bibliography. Here is a nine-point checklist for coordinators turning that requirement into a policy teachers can run.
School-wide AI policies are too broad to teach from. Here is how to write AI rules for a single assignment, with three worked examples a teacher can copy.
A script for the conversation after a student hands in AI-generated text. Not an accusation, not a tribunal. Five questions that lead somewhere.
Grammarly Authorship lets a student prove how a document was written. Cognity lets a teacher set the rules and read the whole process. An honest comparison of what each record contains.
Why the text can't settle it, why detectors don't either, and three ways to see how a student actually worked.
Both tools show teachers how student writing was produced. They differ in where the AI lives, who buys them, and what the record contains. An honest comparison.
The IB requires AI-generated work to be credited in the text and bibliography. A plain acknowledgement template your students can copy, and how a teacher can check it against a record.